(History of the Military Issued Sleeping bag)

By: William McKinney

President, Bradley’s Military Enterprises

The Down Filled Intermediate & ECW Sleeping Systems:

When I was a young private back in 1982 soldiers were issued 2 different types of military sleeping bags.  Both models were made of cotton with goose down insulation.  In Babenhausen Germany it was cold during the winter, and we were issued the Extreme Cold Weather (ECW) model.  I don’t know if this is factual, but I was told the ECW sleeping bag had a -30F temperature rating.  The other model I was issued in Ft. Hood Texas was an Intermediate Cold Weather sleeping bag.  I was told this had a 10F rating.  Both models looked identical from the outside, but the ECW model was thicker than the intermediate bag.  With this being said I wouldn’t be able to differentiate a tightly rolled ECW bag from a loosely rolled intermediate model.  The easiest way to determine which model you were issued was to look at the bold printed writing on foot of the sleeping bag.  You could also look inside of the sleeping bag at the label.  Both approaches would identify the type of sleeping bag you have.  Here are some of my thoughts about the military’s intermediate and ECW down filled sleeping bags:

• Both bags are relatively warm. I feel the older down filled intermediate and ECW sleeping bags are warmer than their modern counterparts.
• The tie strings at the foot of the down filled bag are practical for rolling up the sleep system, but it is grossly inferior to the modern day stuff sack.
• The older down filled models are heavy and bulky when compared to the modern day modular sleep system.
• The newer modular system with its clever compression sack compacts smaller and stores away significantly better than down filled bags. During the down filled sleeping bag era the military didn’t issue rucksacks with built in sleeping bag carriers. We placed our sleeping bag inside of a wet weather bag and used spaghetti or tie down straps to hold the sleep system to the bottom of a LC-2 rucksack. This was a poorly designed approach. The sleeping bag would bounce about continuously. The modular sleep system, on the other hand, compacts tightly using a compression sack, and it fits snuggly into the sleeping bag carrier of a Molle Ruck System. This modern approach is light years superior to the methods used in the good old days.
• If an older down filled sleeping bag got wet it was heavy, and it took forever to dry. The modular sleep system is lighter, dries faster and it is less prone to get wet due to the attachable Gore-Tex cover or “bivey cover.”
• With the exception of being warmer the older sleeping bag models are grossly inferior to the modular sleep system issued today.

The newer modular system with its clever compression sack compacts smaller and stores away significantly better than down filled bags. During the down filled sleeping bag era the military didn’t issue rucksacks with built in sleeping bag carriers. We placed our sleeping bag inside of a wet weather bag and used spaghetti or tie down straps to hold the sleep system to the bottom of a LC-2 rucksack. This was a poorly designed approach. The sleeping bag would bounce about continuously. The modular sleep system, on the other hand, compacts tightly using a compression sack, and it fits snuggly into the sleeping bag carrier of a Molle Ruck System. This modern approach is light years superior to the methods used in the good old days.

• If an older down filled sleeping bag got wet it was heavy, and it took forever to dry. The modular sleep system is lighter, dries faster and it is less prone to get wet due to the attachable Gore-Tex cover or “bivey cover.”
• With the exception of being warmer the older sleeping bag models are grossly inferior to the modular sleep system issued today.

Generation I:  The  2-piece Gore-Tex Sleeping Bag System:

This sleeping system consisted of the following parts:

• A brown intermediate cold weather sleeping bag made of nylon rip stop material and continuous filament polyester insulation. The sleeping bag could be zippered closed or use garment snaps. There are additional snaps on the intermediate sleep system that allows a Gore-Tex cover to be directly attached over the bag. A draw cord allows the hood of the mummy bag to be open wider or closed tighter. In later models the intermediate bag was offered in solid green.
• As previously mentioned there is a Gore-Tex cover that could be attached to the intermediate sleeping bag. Officially this item is known as a bivey cover. In the earlier models the top of the cover used woodland camouflage material and the bottom was brown. Later bivey covers were completely covered in woodland camo.
• The system included a brown nylon compression sack that tightened from the side. The sleeping bag and cover would be placed inside of this sack, and it would substantially compress the contents down in size for better storage.

In the early 1990 era I was introduced to the Gore-Tex sleeping bag system.  I was immediately impressed with how light the system felt.  I was especially impressed with the introduction  of the compression sack, but I seriously questioned the warmth of the system.  When I attended distant gun shows during this period, I used the 2-piece system regularly in the back of our company cube truck.  As I suspected this 2 piece model wasn’t very warm when the temperature fell below freezing.  Therefore, I used the older down filled ECW model during the heart of winter and used the 2-piece Gore-Tex model during the warmer months.  Here are some of my summarized thoughts about the older 2-piece Gore-Tex sleeping bag system:

• The system was significantly lighter than the older down filled models.
• The feel of the nylon was more comfortable on the skin.
• The Gore-Tex cover was an outstanding concept. This would increase warmth and dryness while keeping the weight of the system light.
• The 2-piece sleeping bag is the lightest sleep system ever issued by the military.
• I have been told this system has a 10F temperature rating. With this being said during the peak of a brutal winter, the system is not effective at keeping you warm. It would be fine in Texas, but it sorely lacked enough insulation here in Northern New York.

Generation II:  The  3-piece Gore-Tex Sleeping Bag System:

This sleeping system consisted of the following parts:

• A thin green patrol bag made of rip stop nylon and polyester insulation. This thin sleeping bag uses a zipper and has a garment snap backup system. The patrol bag can be used by itself or snapped into the intermediate sleep system.
• A thicker black intermediate cold weather sleeping bag made of nylon rip stop material and continuous filament polyester insulation. The sleeping bag could be zippered closed or use garment snaps. There are additional snaps on the intermediate sleep system that allows a Gore-Tex cover to be directly attached over the bag. A draw cord allows the hood of the mummy bag to be open wider or closed tighter.
• As previously mentioned there is a Gore-Tex cover that could be attached to the intermediate sleeping bag. This “bivey cover” is completely surrounded in woodland camouflage.
• The system included a black nylon compression sack that tightened from the top. The patrol bag, intermediate bags and cover would all be placed inside of this sack, and it would substantially compress the contents down in size for better storage.

The 3-piece Gore-Tex sleeping bag system is superior to the 2 piece model, and it addresses the major shortcoming of the older model.  This newer sleep system provides adequate warmth.  Used in combination with all of the parts, the addition of the patrol bag adds enough warmth to make life bearable under extreme cold weather conditions.

I want to express that I like the modular concept of this sleeping bag system and how the different bags can be used together or independently.  The thin patrol bag is ideal for summer use.  The intermediate bag is ideal for use in late spring or early fall.  When the patrol bag, intermediate bag and Gore-Tex cover are all attached it provides sufficient warmth in most winter conditions.  Although this sleeping system is rated to -30F, personally  I wouldn’t want to use it if it fell below 10F.  I will confess that my tolerance to cold weather is significantly less than the average person and far less than the average infantry soldier.  The good news is that the 3-peice model is warmer and more practical than the older 2-piece model.   Here are my summarized thoughts about the 3-piece sleeping system:

• The major improvement of the 3-piece system is the introduction of the patrol bag. This thin sleeping bag is ideal for summer use, and it improves the warmth of the complete system for winter use.
• The next biggest improvement is the compression sack. The top tightening approach is superior than using the side compression approach. By adding pressure with your knee at the top of the sack you can compress the contents much tighter than before.

Generation III:  The Universal Camouflage Modular Sleep System:

• Gore-Tex BIVY outer cover bag 60 F (1.5 lbs)
• Patrol Sleeping Bag 30 to 50 F (3 lbs)
• Intermediate Cold Weather Sleeping Bag 30 to -10 F (4 lbs)
• Large Compression Stuff Sack
• Small Compression Stuff Sack
• The completely integrated system is rated to -30 F when the user wears the expedition weight polypropylene shirt, drawers and issue cushion sole woolen socks.
• To obtain lower temperature ratings, additional layers of Extreme Cold Weather Clothing articles must be added to the user’s clothing ensemble inside the sleeping bag.
• The sleeping bag laid out measures 96″, 34″ at the shoulders, and 5×7 packed.

The MSS consists of a camouflaged, waterproof, breathable Gore-Tex bivy cover, a lightweight patrol sleeping bag, and an intermediate cold weather sleeping bag. 2 compression sacks are included to store and carry the system. The MSS is available in colors compatible with the universal camouflage pattern. The patrol bag provides cold weather protection from 35 to 50 degrees Fahrenheit. The intermediate bag provides cold weather protection from minus 5 to 35 degrees Fahrenheit. Together, the patrol bag and intermediate bags provide extreme cold weather protection in temperatures as low as minus 30 degrees Fahrenheit. The bivy cover can be used with each of three MSS configurations (patrol, intermediate, or combined) to be comparable with the environment in which the system is being used; the bivy cover provides environmental protection from wind and water. Sleeping bags are made of rip stop nylon fabrics and continuous filament polyester insulation; camouflage bivy cover is made with waterproof, breathable, coated or laminated nylon fabric called Gore-Tex; the compression sacks are made with water-resistant, durable nylon fabric.

This system is very similar to the older 3-piece system with the exception that the bivy cover comes in universal camouflage pattern with matching color tones with the patrol & intermediate bags.  The most noticeable improvement was made to the compression sack.  Rather than 1 larger compression sack used with the older models the newest system has 2 sacks.  The compression sacks have 2 sizes.  The smaller size is used for independent use of the patrol bag, and the larger sack is used with independent use of the intermediate bag  The 2 compression sacks attach to one another and house the complete system.

Other Thoughts:

• When the average soldier refers to their 2-piece or 3-piece systems they are not including the compression sack. I think it would be less confusing if the compression sacks were included in the description. If this were the case the Army has issued 3, 4 and 5-piece sleeping systems. Some people do use this description all though it is not an official title.
• Although I have mentioned that I wouldn’t use this sleeping system under 10F keep in mind I have little tolerance to cold weather, and I like to “sniffle.”
• Due to its light weight, water resistant and highly compactable features this sleeping bag is ideal for many outdoorsmen and survivalists. It is well suited for many civilian applications.

Summary:

I’m impressed with the improvements the Army has made to its individual soldier equipment.  The modular sleep system, more commonly known as the Gore-Tex sleeping bag is no exception.  This is a good light weight piece of equipment that stores away well into any backpack.  I encourage serious hunters or hardcore survivalists to take a look at the MSS sleeping bag.  I anticipate it will take care of the needs of many of my customers.

Sincerely;

William G. McKinney

Bradley’s Military Enterprises

President

 by: William McKinney

President, Bradley’s Military Surplus

One of the most valuable lessons I learned from my field training in the military was the importance of traveling light. I will confess this concept wasn’t promoted by the Army or my chain of command during my days of service. In contrast, the Army’s motto at the time was “Be Prepared.” Heavy loaded packing lists were made, soldiers were expected to carry everything on these lists, and NCOs conducted regular inspections to ensure soldiers packed everything according to standard operating procedures. Lower enlisted soldiers were required to pack mess kits, shelter halves, and many other things that were never used. It didn’t matter that soldiers didn’t need an item, or some soldiers backpacks weighed as much as 80 pounds. We were still required to pack everything on these packing lists…..but I usually found a way to cut a corner. Yes, I presented all items for the inspection process, but I found a way to ditch what wasn’t necessary as quickly as possible. Usually, I found a way to dump the excess weight before I left garrison. If I couldn’t jettison the luggage in the rear I actually bagged items and bury them in the ground shortly after I went to the field. When the field problem was over I would return to the training area and retrieve my belongings.

Although this is a rough estimate, I believe I carried half of what the average soldier packed. I placed much thought into what I put into my rucksack. I packed my backpack as efficiently and effectively as possible. I never carried any excess waste or extras. I didn’t even carry luxury items such as candy or tobacco. I focused on traveling light, and it paid substantial rewards again and again. When the average soldier was tired and the weak fell out of forced road marches I had excess energy to burn. I was light and comfortable, and I empathized for those who over packed. Sure, there were times when I was cold, hungry, bored or unprepared. Yes, there were times when I wished I packed something I didn’t bring to the field, but this didn’t happen often. During my first 2 years of service I learned from my mistakes, and I learned how to pack my bags better. Eventually I knew exactly what I needed to pack, and it actually became a routine.
20 years later, I am still putting my skills at traveling light to good use. 2 weeks ago I traveled to Santiago Chile, Buenos Aires Argentina, Montevideo Uruguay and El Calafate Argentina.  Here I just arrived in Chile:

During this 2 week period I lived out of a 3-Day Assault Pack from Rothco. The pack’s dimensions are 20″ X 12″ X 7,” and it weighed roughly 20 pounds fully loaded.  Here’s a visual so that you can see how it’s structured:

As you can see, it’s substantially smaller than a backpack but thanks to it’s versatile design and 3 compartments it is both efficient and effective.

I was able to fit the following items in my assault pack:

• 4 x cargo shorts
• 4 x underwear briefs
• 4 x socks water shoes
• 4 x tank tops
• Grid fleece trousers
• Polypro shirt
• Fleece cap
• 2 x paperback books
• 550 cord (50 ft.)
• Neoprene gloves
• Alarm clock
• Small fishing reel
• Small tackle box
• Toothbrush & case
• Rain jacket

On my body I carried the following items:

• GI ICWB boots
• Socks
• Polar fleece trousers
• Underwear
• T-shirt
• Polar fleece jacket
• 2 x wallets
• Passport
• 3 x dog tags
• Paperwork
• Attachable lanyard

Although many people would suggest that I carried too little I was pleased with what I brought. This is especially true considering the weather conditions I faced in Montevideo Uruguay ranged in the upper 80s while they fell close to freezing in Patagonia Argentina. Despite this wide temperature range I still was comfortable. This is largely due to packing light and using some of Bradley’s products. I regularly find these military products are ideal for lightweight backpacking.

Like the average soldier the average civilian tends to prepare for every possible outcome, and he or she packs away as much as possible. I might be wrong, but I would suggest that people tend to be hoarders by nature. The average individual tends to pack their luggage with too much weight. Although this makes many feel secure it also causes them to be cumbersome, heavy and exhausted. In most cases, travelers don’t realize how much the “ball and chain” saps their energy. They merely want to ensure they have everything they need regardless of their circumstances. This is both unrealistic and unpractical. I have found that the lighter I pack the more I enjoy myself. Since I’m a civilian these days I also found there are more options as I travel. Allow me to share some of my traveling tips with you.

The Disposable Approach:

As I prepared for my trip to South America I packed items that I planned to throw away as my vacation unfolded. I packed worn out underwear, socks, shorts and shirts. Even my water shoes were badly worn, and I planned to dump them once I needed more room. Based on the unique situation, I figured that I wouldn’t be smart enough to pack everything I needed, so I would buy anything that was required as my vacation unfolded. The “pay as you go” and “dump what you don’t need” approaches worked very well for me.

The little or nothing approach:

I chose to pack my small assault pack as full as possible and dump what I didn’t need, but another wise approach would be to pack virtually nothing. Simply take your backpack, pack a few items you’re sure you’ll need and buy what you need as you travel. This may be a more expensive way to travel, but it may be the best approach based on the situation. It also leaves you plenty room for souvenirs.

The store it away approach:

When I first arrived in South America I spent my time in hot weather regions. I explored Santiago Chile, Buenos Aires and Montevideo Uruguay. All of these cities were experiencing hot sunny weather and temperatures were ranging from 78 F to 88 F. During this part of my trip I used shorts, tank tops and water shoes. Before I left for the cold weather regions of Patagonia I pack my summer clothing in a plastic bag, and I asked the hotel staff to store away my belongings for 4 days. The staff was more than happy to assist me with this task, and it was very much appreciated. It lightened my carrying load, and it allowed me to focus on the 32F to 55F weather I would face in El Calafate Argentina.

Note the climate as pictured in this photo I took while in Patagonia. Cool, dry and absolutely beautiful.

The Double Wallet Approach:

Before I went on my trip I did research and discovered that most of the larger South American cities have substantial problems with petty crime. Based on this knowledge I focused on protecting my belongings. My security strategy focused on a double wallet approach. I carried one wallet in my front pant pocket. I clipped a lanyard onto this wallet and attached it to my shorts. My second wallet and passport was carried in a hidden pocket in the crotch of my underwear. Before I left home I had Bradley’s sewing staff build a pocket inside of my underwear. This pocket was sealable using Velcro. The main concept behind this strategy was to carry very little money and no valuables in my short pocket. If someone robbed me I would give them the “dummy wallet.” Hopefully, I would be able to protect my valuables by offering this decoy. Since I never faced a robber I don’t know if this is an effective approach, but I like the concept.

The Military Approach:

Obviously I have a biased point of view since I’m the president of a military retail business, but I honestly feel military style products are ideal for the light traveler or backpacker. Over the past 2 decades military equipment has become more light, compact and comfortable. More pockets and better designs allow travelers to carry more items comfortably. Today’s military cold weather clothing is lighter, warmer and more breathable. Wet weather gear is also more breathable, and military surplus businesses such as Bradley’s usually offer a nice selection of bags and backpacks at reasonable prices.

There is no question that the military’s most current equipment is ideal for tourist travel, and I discovered another benefit while visiting Buenos Aires. While exploring the city I stopped at a restaurant for a meal. As I prepared to leave my waitress asked me how I was planning to return to my hotel. When I stated that I was walking she told me I ventured into the wrong side of town. She explained that tourist don’t usually venture where I was, and it wasn’t safe to walk the streets after dark. When I told her that I walked for hours to her restaurant and it was dark she told me it only happened because I was a big man and I have “the look.” My waitress said in broken English “You are a Marino, si?” Then she pointed at my dog tags. I realized that she thought I was a Marine, and I could also recall hearing others say the word Marino earlier in the day. Looking back on the day’s events it is very possible I discouraged some possible thieves because I appeared to be a tough looking Marine. Based on my waitress’ advice I allowed her to call a cab, and I rode to my hotel. It is very possible I closely avoided a dangerous situation, and my military clothing and backpack may have helped me.

That being said, the tourist area was lively and extremely interesting.  I was lucky enough to visit several shops and do a bit of light shopping.  Here are some photos of my tourist excursion in Beunos Aires.

What I’m happy I brought to South America:

Lanyard:

This is a very simple item, but bringing a lanyard was wise decision making. I used it to hold my decoy wallet, camera, and hotel key. The lanyard helped keep these essential items centralized and prevented loss or theft.

Military Style Cargo Shorts:.

The large cargo pocket on my military style shorts was ideal for travel. Furthermore, the button down pockets prevents theft.  You can also click on

Polypropylene & Grid Fleece Thermal Underwear:

These items pack away nicely and provided warmth while I was traveling in Patagonia.

Military Style Polar Fleece Items:

Although these items are a bit bulky, I needed these items at El Calafate (Patagonia). This polypro / polar fleece combination provided all the warmth I needed at that point in the season.  Below is an example of the elements I was up against in the chilly Glaciers at El Calafatein Argentina.

Genuine Issue ICWB Boots:

The temperature and rugged terrain in Patagonia was well suited for Intermediate Cold Weather Boots. During this trip I road marched all day long. I wouldn’t be surprised if I walked more in the last 2 weeks than any other time since I was soldier. Having a pair of boots that was comfortable and durable was another wise choice. Again, here is an example of the rugged terrain that made easier to navigate, thanks to the stability of the Intermediate Cold Weather boots.

Dog Tags:

I wore a set of dog tags around my neck at all times. I also attached a dog tag to one of my boots. On these tags I recorded my name, blood type, home town, state, and telephone number. I intentionally didn’t include my social security number to ensure it didn’t fall into the wrong hands. I didn’t run into any serious trouble in South America, but I’m happy I wore a set. I looked at it as an insurance policy.  Again, feel free to click on the link or the picture to be located to where you can purchase your own set of Dog Tags on our website.

The Favorite Parts of My Trip:

• The Glaciers at El Calafate Argentina was breathtakingly beautiful.
• Argentina’s range feed dry cured beef was incredible. The flavor is substantially different than what we eat in the US. If you go to Argentina you must try a nice steak.
• The unspoiled nature of the Patagonia region of Argentina was spectacular.
• The Andes Mountains in Chile were majestic.
• The beaches and night life in Montevideo were very enjoyable.

What I didn’t enjoy:

• The 12 hour flight was exhausting.
• The traffic in Buenos Aires is madness. Despite the heavy congestion virtually every driver was traveling too fast. Everyone was jockeying for a better position, and the conditions were slightly dangerous.
• Before I left on my vacation I was told Argentina’s economy was inexpensive. Perhaps I was spending my money in the wrong places, but I felt Argentina was expensive. Other tourist told me I should explore Peru, Ecuador or Bolivia to find better bargains.
• My lack of Spanish caused problems at times, but I have no one to blame but myself. With this being said I had no problem getting by. Between my little Spanish and the average Argentinean’s limited English I was able to understand what I needed to know.

Summary:

My trip to South America was very enjoyable. I saw spectacular sights. I expanded my limited Spanish vocabulary. I learned a lot about the South American culture, and I came home with good stories. Despite traveling ultra light I was comfortable, and I attribute a great deal of this comfort to my choice in what I brought on my trip. I strongly recommend some of the military’s clothing and equipment to those who like to travel light. This is especially true for back packers. I encourage my customers to experiment with traveling light, and enjoy yourself on your next trip!

If you have any questions about the gear I used on this trip, feel free to drop us an email at service@bradleyssurplus.com or by calling our toll free number at 1 (800) 503-4954.  Our Mail Order team is very well versed in our extensive cold weather systems as well as the various other gear we carry for long and short term trips.  As always we are more than happy to answer any and all inquiries you may have.

Sincerely,

William G. McKinney
Bradley’s Military Enterprises
President

The last piece of military equipment I will discuss in this 3 part article is the MOLLE hydration system. You have been introduced to the MOLLE tactical vest and backpack systems in the last two articles. After speaking about the military’s hydration system this will cover all 3 parts of the MOLLE system.

During the World War II era soldiers were issued two aluminum 1 quart canteens that were used in conjunction with their web gear. Over time these aluminum canteens changed over to hard plastic versions. Soon afterwards collapsible 2 quart and 5 quart bladders were introduced. By the late 1980′s or early 1990′s some soldiers were using a civilian product that is known as a “canteen straw.” This product was less of a “straw” and more of a hose or tube. At one end of the hose was a canteen cap, and the other had a bit valve. The canteen straw could be used with the military’s 1, 2, and 5 quart hydration systems. This hose system offered convenient access to water on long road marches. Various canteens or bladders could be securely stored away, and the need to remove and open canteens was eliminated. As the military became more aware of the threats associated with heat injuries collapsible bladders and canteen straws paved the road for more robust high capacity hydration systems. This catalyst gave birth to the hydration pack.

The hydration pack is a type of hydration system built as a backpack or waist pack containing a reservoir or bladder commonly made of rubber or flexible plastic. The reservoir contains a capped mouth for filling with liquid and a hose that allows the wearer to drink hands-free. Most hoses end with a “bite valve” that opens when the user bites down on it; the valve may be protected by a dust cover. Some hydration packs are insulated to keep water from freezing or becoming warm. Reservoir sizes commonly range from 1.5 to 3.0 liters. Some of the latest developments include hydration packs that have pressurized hydration bladders which will force water through an in-line-filter allowing the user access to clean water on-the-go.

Hydration packs are commonly used for outdoor recreational activities, such as hiking, bicycling, and kayaking, as well as for military maneuvers. The information in the last paragraph was gathered HERE.

Features:

• 100 oz. bladder
• Large fill port
• MOLLE webbing for attaching additional gear
• Should straps
• Waist strap
• Drinking tube with mouth piece
• Made in the USA
• NSN: 8465-01-524-8362

The MOLLE hydration system has a polyurethane 3-Liter bladder. Attached to the bladder is a neoprene covered hose with a soft bite value. The bite valve has a on/off switch. The rectangular bladder carrier is made with U.S. licensed 1000D Cordura Nylon with Quick Release Buckles on the Carrying straps. The original hydration system was OD green, but it eventually progressed to 3-color desert, UCP, and OCP camouflage. The most current hydration carriers are M.O.L.L.E. Compatible.

The first hydration packs introduced to soldiers were quite simple. The system consisted of a bladder and cover, and the cover possessed very basic shoulder straps. Latter generations added PALS webbing to make it MOLLE compatible. The mouth of the bladder system was widened to make it easier to pour water into the system. Improvements were made to the hose and bite valve, and various adjustment straps and quick release buckles were added to make it easier to put on or off. Despite these changes, the outward appearance of the hydration system looked virtually the same.

While the Army issued these basic hydration systems companies such as CamelBak and Black Hawk introduced more robust systems. The direction these companies pursued was to combine the hydration bladder with impressive assault packs. This concept appears to be popular with soldiers despite the hefty price tag that is associated with such hydration systems. Although I can’t see into the future, I sense the hydration system / assault pack combination will eventually become an Army issued piece of equipment.

The CamelBak Motherlode Cargo/ Hydration Backpack features 2258 cubic inches of cargo space and a 100 ounce (3 liter) water reservoir. The pack also features an Air Director Back Panel for superior ventilation. Cargo volume: 2258 cubic inches (37 liters) Includes 100 ounce (3 liter) OMEGA Water Beast Reservoir with HydroLink Exit Port Easy-to-fill and clean wide-mouth OMEGA fillport and integrated handle allows you to add ice Insulated multi-layered PureFlow drink tube keeps water tasting fresh with no plastic taste Patented Big Bite Valve: bite and sit to drink with self-sealing medical grade silicone HydroLink Exit Port and Drink Port HydroLock valve provides secure, positive lever-action flow shut-off when not drinking and is easy to use with gloves One-handed flow control Side-release buckles for quick release from shoulder harness, compression straps and waist belt Zippered back panel access makes loading a full reservoir easy Air Director Back Panel provides superior ventilation Multiple drink tube exit ports for routing drink tube over the shoulder or under an arm Glasses, goggles and NVG pocket with external access MOLLE attachment system integrated to bottom of boot 500D Cordura fabric front panel, gussets and shoulder harness front side 420D high density nylon on shoulder harness back side, padded waist belt and back panel 10mm EVA foam shoulder harness and padded waist belt 5mm PE foam for hydration compartment divider 200 Nylon lining Nylon webbing Army Universal…

Features:

• Decreased weight by 1 lb while increasing volume by 400 cu in
• Fleece-lined pocket for glasses, goggles, and NVG’s with external access
• Improved Air Director™ back panel provides better ventilation
• Lightweight, durable 500D Cordura® is 35% lighter than 1000D
• Increased internal organization
• Lower drink tube exit ports for under arm tube routing
• Zippered back panel access makes loading a full reservoir easy
• Add or remove name tags and unit badges quickly with integrated hook-and-loop panel
• OMEGA™ Water Beast™ Reservoir – with Lifetime Warranty
• HydroLink™ Big Bite™ Valve Cover
• HydroLock™ valve securely shuts off water flow
• 2 in (51 mm) padded, removable waist belt incorporates a lower compression system for better fit
• Upper and lower compression straps
• Adjustable length elastic sternum strap
• Hook-and-loop strap management
• Insulated Neoprene tube cover keeps liquids cool or warm while protecting from harmful UV rays
• MOLLE attachment system integrated to bottom of boot
• Elastic drawstring pocket in main storage compartment can accomodate a second reservoir
• Zippered mesh pocket in main storage compartment for keys, clips, etc.
• Noiseless zipper pulls
• Nylon webbing with hanger loop
• S/ R buckles for quick release from shoulder harness, compression straps and waist belt
• D-Rings and webbing loops for tube management
• Grommet drain holes located at bottom of each pocket and compartment
• Printed MOLLE webbing on AUC and Digital Desert patterns

The new Motherlode™ 500 is now a pound lighter than the original by making material and structural changes without compromising design, durability, and functionality.

Features:

• Constructed of heavy-duty 1000 denier nylon
• Reinforced stitching to ensure durability
• Includes 100 oz. BLACKHAWK!® Hydration System
• Drink system protected by Microban® antimicrobial treatment
• Bite Me® bite valve and patent-pending quick-disconnect system
• 3-D mesh back panel with frame
• External hydration reservoir access
• Numerous internal pockets and dividers
• Dual antenna ports
• Robust waist belt with additional S.T.R.I.K.E.® attachment points
• Tie-down straps in main compartment
• Includes Upright GP Pouch (37CL52) and Nalgene® Bottle Pouch (37CL70)

Specifications:

• Dimensions (main comp.): 20”L x 12.5”W x 7.5”D
• Dimensions (top front comp.): 14”L x 12.5”W x 2.75”D
• Dimensions (bottom front): 12.5”L x 6”W x 3”D
• Dimensions (side comp.): 8.25”L x 5”W x 3.75”D
• Dimensions (side comp.): 9”L x 4”W x 2”D
• Cubes: 2800 cu. in. / 40 L

Features:

• Includes 100 oz. BLACKHAWK!® Hydration System
• Drink system protected by Microban® antimicrobial technology
• Bite Me® bite valve and patent-pending quick-disconnect system
• Twin compartments for extra storage
• Large compartment has internal pouch for radio packs and three antenna ports with flaps
• Anodized D-rings and quick-cinch buckles for compatibility with 3-Day accessory pouches
• Reinforced waist belt with additional attachment points
• Padded, contour-fit shoulder straps with sternum strap
• Rubber drag handle
• Metal grommet at bottom of pack for drainage

Specifications:

• Dimensions (main comp.): 19”L x 11”W x 5.5”D
• Dimensions (front-top comp.): 9.5”L x 7”W x 3”D
• Dimensions (front-bottom comp.): 11”L x 11.5”W x 3.5”D
• Cubes: 1800 cu. in. / 32 L
• Capacity: 100 oz. / 3 L

The Blackhawk HydraStorm Cyclone pack is a versatile, rugged backpack and is NTOA reviewed and approved. It has quickly become a Blackhawk customer favorite. It features twin compartments for extra storage. The large compartment has an internal pouch for radio packs and three antenna ports with flaps. With over 100 external S.T.R.I.K.E. webbing attachment points you’ll have no shortage of places to attach your must-have gear pouches. The reinforced waist belt adds stability and has its own MOLLE attachment points.

The introduction of MOLLE tactical vests, backpacks, and advanced hydration systems were revolutionary concepts that grossly exceeded what the military used in the past. Offering a tactical vest that could be modified and carry more equipment comfortably was wise decision making. Offering a backpack with a built in sleeping bag carrier, more padding and a detachable assault pack was another step in the right direction. Finally, creating hydration systems where soldiers could carry more water, offer easier access to the water source, and being able to carry it comfortably was brilliant!

Soldiers often reminisce about the good old days, but this rhetoric has more to do with issues surrounding new work policies or personal conduct matters. One area of the Army that has unquestionably improved over the past 2 decades is the personal equipment soldiers use on a daily basis. Without a doubt these improvements are astonishing, and the Army appears to have more good concepts in the pipeline. With this in mind, I encourage my civilian customers to experiment with these new military products. I believe you will discover that military surplus items offers a tremendous value that is unbeatable! Compare issues surrounding quality, durability and price, and you will soon discover many military products offer more bang for the buck!

For more information on MOLLE equipment visit THIS site.

Sincerely;

William G. McKinney
Bradley’s Military Enterprises
President

In my last article I discussed the historical background of standard web gear (LCE), how it evolved into a tactical load bearing vest (LBV) and progressed into a MOLLE Fighting Load Carrier (FLC). As I mentioned; at this point in time, the Army is also introducing a new MOLLE chest harness known as a “TAPS.” The point I’m trying to communicate is the way soldiers have been carrying their fighting equipment is progressing in a positive direction since I joined the Army in 1982. I would suggest that the military’s various backpacks systems have also been progressing in a positive direction although some negative feedback suggest the MOLLE-II frame has durability issues that need to be resolved.

Features:

• ALICE: (All-Purpose Lightweight Individual Carrying Equipment).
• NSN # 8465-01-019-9103 SP0100-05-C-4079.
• The main field Pack is approximately 20″ x 19.”
• The large main compartment has a locking draw strings.
• It has 3 pouches on the outside of the rucksack.
• LC2 – Medium W/Frame has a max load of 45 LBS.
• LC2 – Large W/Frame has a max load of 60 Lbs.

The LC-2 rucksack is a very simple system. It has an external aluminum alloy frame, a removable or strapped in kidney belt and shoulder pad set. The kidney pad had a plastic quick release buckle during the 1980′s and upgraded to a Fastex buckle in the early 1990′s. The shoulder straps also had quick release features. The rucksack came in 3 sizes that consisted of small, medium, and large. The medium rucksacks could be used with or without the frame. The large rucksack was designed to be used with the frame at all times. The main carrying sack was made of OD green nylon material although some medium sized versions came in woodland camouflage. The top loading flap has a hidden map compartment within it, and a radio carrying pouch was intended to remain within the main sack.

The design of the LC-II rucksack system virtually remained unchanged since World War II. Older versions used a cotton canvas sack and an “A-frame.” Newer versions used nylon materials and a rectangular frame, but the changes were very simple in nature. Most of these changes were designed to make it easier to put the backpack on or off. Once again, the main improvements came in the form of quick release buckles on the shoulder straps and kidney belt.

Like anything in life, the LC-II rucksack system had its strengths and weaknesses. Here is how I would evaluate the backpack system:

PROS:

• This backpack system is incredibly simple. It could be easily assembled or disassembled in 10 minutes or less without using any tools or instruction manuals. There is something that is very “profound” about simplicity when you think about it.
• This simple backpack is very durable.
• It’s an inexpensive rucksack system, and the replacement parts are also very cheap. You could quickly and inexpensively replace any of the parts associated with this backpack system with very little effort.
• The capacity of the LC-II main sack was limited, but it reduces the likeliness for soldiers to carry too much weight. Perhaps this was a blessing in disguise.
• Without a doubt the simplicity of the system is its greatest attribute.

CONS:

• The LC-II system didn’t have a built in sleeping bag carrier.
• During my years in the Army soldiers would put their sleeping bag inside of a wet weather bag, and used various straps to attach their sleeping bag to the bottom of their frame. These various “spaghetti straps” or tie down straps were somewhat ineffective. The way I remembered it was that the straps had to be continuously tightened or adjusted. Even when it was fixed in place, the sleeping bag would bounce about as you walked. This bouncing and swaying made the system very noisy and annoying.
• The LC-II rucksack wasn’t waterproof. Soldiers used wet weather bags and zip lock sandwich bags to keep items dry. Before the 1990′s you didn’t expect too much pertaining to any military equipment. You simply made due with whatever you received.
• The shoulder straps during this era had little padding, and it dug deep into the average soldier’s shoulders during long road marches. In m opinion the LC-II rucksack system was somewhat uncomfortable.
• The loading capacity of the LC-II system was quite limited with the small and medium rucksacks. Even the large system had limited capacity, especially since none of the models had had any type of a sleeping bag carrier.
• Soldiers had to think hard about what they would be taking to the field because of the limited capacity of the LC-II rucksack system. In some respects this was a good thing because soldiers tend to carry too many things or too much weight. In other respects it was a serious drawback because there are times when soldiers didn’t have enough room to carry everything that was really needed.

My Thoughts:

The LC-II large ruck system was a good product back in the day, but its time has passed bye long ago. Its best attributes are associated with being inexpensive, simple to figure out and easy to use. It’s also very durable, but it pales in comparison to the newer CFP-90 or MOLLE models. I would suspect that the older LC-II or ALICE technology is more comparable to what most second world nations or some third world nations use today.

• Pack Weight: 6.5 lbs
• Main Sack: 31″ x 8″ x 14″
• Total Size 4026 Cubic Inches Not Including The Assault Pack
• Sustainment Side Pouches:
Right Side: 18″ x 6″ x 3.5″
Left Side: 9.5″ x 6″ x 3.5″
• Assault Pack: 14.5″ x 16.5″ x 4″.
• CFP-90 W/O patrol pack Max load 100 Lbs.
• CFP-90 W/Patrol pack Max load carried 120 Lbs.
• Removable aluminum staves for rigid construction
• Adjustable side compression bags and belts
• Made with The 1000 denier nylon

• CFP-90 military issue field pack
• Straps with quick release
• Material : Nylon Cordura
• Compression straps
• 66см Х 33см Х 23см
• NSN: 8465-01-286-5356

It’s obvious that the military’s decision makers focused hard on the weaknesses of LC-II system as it built the next generation of military backpacks. It widened the shoulder straps on the newer ruck systems and included more padding. It increased the loading capacity of the main sack, and included an internal sleeping bag carrying system. This newer and larger system was known as the CFP-90 by the Army and the Vector Pack by the Marines. It was also commonly called the” Lowe Ruck” by soldiers because the first models were built by the Lowe Alpine Company . Here are other thoughts about the CFP-90:

PROS:

• The CFP-90 was a product of the 1990 era. It marked a new beginning.
• The CFP-90 is the largest backpack system ever issued in the Army.
• The main cavity of the CFP-90 system is incredibly large. It offers soldiers enough room to carry everything they need. Maybe this is too much room for many soldiers. Soldiers tend too over pack, and this additional weight saps the average soldier’s energy. With this being said, there are many times when the additional capacity would prove useful. Virtually everything in life is contingent upon the situation.
• Using a string tied divider, the main carrying sack is compartmentalized into a main body and sleeping bag carrier. At the bottom of the rucksack there is a zipper for easy access for your sleeping bag. This is a clever concept. You can dig out your belongings from the top, and you have quick access to your sleeping bag from the bottom.
• The internal sleeping bag carrier is an ideal way to transport a sleeping bag. This is especially true when combined with the sleeping bag compression sack that was introduced at the same time as the CFP-90. This new approach created a tighter more compact configuration that reduces bouncing, swaying and noise.
• The CFP-90′s shoulder pads are significantly wider, more padded and much more comfortable than the older LC-II model. This padding makes the CFP-90 much more comfortable on long road marches.
• The attachable / detachable assault pack was an OUTSTANDING IDEA that was well received by soldiers. When the situation allows, the larger ruck system could be stored away in a patrol base or CP, and soldiers can rely on the lighter more stealthful assault pack. This concept has become very popular giving birth to more enhanced assault packs as well as the larger 3-Day assault pack.
• The CFP-90 system has an adjustable lumbar pad and various shoulder strap adjustments that creates personal comforts for the individual soldier. Since every soldier has a unique combinations of height, weight, injuries and physical conditioning these adjustable systems are very desirable.

CONS:

• There were some misgivings about the CFP-90′s internal frame. It may be ideal for many civilian applications, but many soldiers questioned its durability or transition into military use.
• The whole backpack system was a bit too “top heavy.” Soldiers loaded it with too much gear, and it stood too high. The combination of excessive height and weight made it unstable.
• The 1000 denier Cordura nylon use to make the CFP-90 is said to be water resistant. If it is then it isn’t very water resistant. Rain will penetrate this ruck system, and waterproof bags are required to keep your belongings dry.
• The original CFP-90 assault pack was very simple. It was similar to a square map case bag with a zipper, and it possessed a couple Fastex buckles that could attached it to the main rucksack system. Although this flimsy assault pack was grossly underdeveloped in modern day terms, it laid the foundation for what would come in the future.

My Opinion:

The introduction of the CFP-90 marked a new modern era in the US military. There were many stark differences between the CFP-90 and the older ALICE backpack system. There were huge differences between the newer tactical load bearing vest and basic web gear. The Gore-Tex sleeping bag with its compact compression sack system runs light years ahead of the older down filled sleep systems. The differences made to individual military equipment during this era were so vast and profound that it indicated the US military was willing to experiment and seek out a new direction. In my opinion, this marked the end of the Korean and Vietnam War mentality. I can’t say it was a renaissance because there wasn’t a rebirth of military learning and science pertaining to individual soldier’s equipment. In reality, it marked a new beginning. Instead of rhetoric about taking care of soldiers, the US armed forces began offering better equipment to its troops. Without a doubt this new direction benefits the average combat arms soldier, and I would suggest that the Army as a whole wins as well. Therefore, the introduction of products such as polypropylene, Gore-Tex, Thinsulate, polar fleece, compression sacks, load bearing vests and the CFP-90 were all good steps in the right direction. All of these advents were a sign of progress.

Features:

• Constructed of 1000 Denier Cordura and regular nylon
• External pack frame
• Shoulder strap assembly with quick release mechanism
• Waist belt
• Removable waist pack
• Main ruck sack (3000 cubic inches)
• Assault pack (500 cubic inches)
• Sleep system carrier (designed for the modular sleep system)
• Two sustainment pouches
• One fighting load carrier
• Three 30 round double magazine pouches
• Two grenade pouches
• Two 1QT general purpose pouches
• Comes in Multicam, ACU, Desert and Woodland camouflage
• Weight: 23 LBS

The MOLLE system can be broken down into 4 categories that consist of the following items:

The MOLLE Rucksack system consists of the following items:

• An external frame.
• Quick release shoulder strap system.
• Molded kidney belt.
• Main rucksack with built in sleeping bag carrier.
• Attachable / detachable Assault Pack.
• 2 Attachable / detachable sustainment pouches.
• Internal radio pouch.

PROS:

• All of the MOLLE-II rucksack components are well constructed with the exception of the frame.
• The backpack’s material is thick, water resistant & durable. Although this system is water resistant I would still recommend using waterproof bags.
• The MOLLE-II assault pack system is more advanced and has more capacity when compared to the older CFP-90 model.
• The newest MOLLE-II package includes an impressive 3-day assault pack that offers significantly more capacity than the standard assault pack.
• The MOLLE backpack and assault pack systems use PALS webbing that allows the allows the addition of other modular MOLLE pouches and components.
• The current MOLLE-II backpack system has a built in sleeping bag carrier that will house a compressed Gore-Tex sleeping bag system. Being able to store equipment up top in the main sack and offering easy access to your sleeping bag from the bottom is a wise concept.
• The older ALICE backpack didn’t offer enough loading capacity to soldiers. The CFP-90 offered too much room and encouraged soldiers to overload equipment. The MOLLE-II backpack system is not too big or small. It is the ideal size for military use.
• This backpack is an impressive looking system. This is especially true for the Multi-Cam version.

CONS:

• Several soldiers have told me that the MOLLE-II frame is prone to break, and it can’t take the punishment of rugged combat conditions. When I researched this subject on line I found many reviews that supported this position. It appears the MOLLE-II frame needs to be upgraded to improve its durability, especially for use in combat air drop operations.
• The original MOLLE-I backpack system used an attachable / detachable sleeping bag carrier. This weaknesses was corrected with the newer MOLLE-II model. I feel a built in sleeping bag carrier is necessary for military use.
• The MOLLE-II system is a bit complex. Assembling and disassembling the main rucksack is difficult, and it requires needle nose pliers. For some, they may require instructions as well.

My Opinion:

If I had to distinguish between the ALICE, CFP-90 and MOLLE-II back pack systems, I would suggest that the major differences were associated with loading capacity, comfort, improved sleeping bag carrying systems and the introduction of the assault pack. When most people speak about the CFP-90 they tend to focus on the internal frame design. When these same people speak about the MOLLE-II backpack they tend to focus on the modular capabilities of the system. I would suggest the best attributes of the newer military backpack systems had nothing to do with internal frames or being able to attach additional pouches. The modular concept surrounding the MOLLE backpack is slightly overrated. Very few soldiers use the additional add on features of the newer MOLLE system any differently than the older CFP-90. Yes, soldiers love the modular add on concepts when it is associated with a tactical vest, but this concept doesn’t carry over as well to the ruck system. I would suggest that the biggest improvement was the introduction of the assault pack. The concept surrounding the detachable assault pack was outstanding. The next best concept was the built in sleeping bag carrier. Widening the shoulder pads and increasing padding was another significant improvement. Internal frames and being able to add pouches is of less importance as being able to work out of a smaller assault pack, addressing the problems with carrying a bulky sleeping bag, or reducing shoulder straps from painfully digging into a soldier’s shoulders.

As for issues surrounding loading capacity, I believe soldiers tend to overload clothing and equipment into their rucksacks. This is especially true when you consider soldiers have to carry food, weapons, ammunition and radios in addition to what is carried in their backpacks. Personally, I don’t believe a fully loaded ruck should weigh more than 50 or 60 pounds. With this criteria in mind, the capacity of the LC-II rucksack was adequate, the CFP-90 was overkill, and the MOLLE-II is ideal.

SUMMARY:

Many Army soldiers share a similar mindset as the traditional baseball fan in the respect that they don’t like big changes. It is common for “military purists” to look back on the good old days with fondness. Many soldiers miss their older equipment and complain about the changes in the military when, for the most part, these changes are for the better. This is especially true about the changes made to individual soldier’s equipment. The CFP-90 is grossly superior to the older LC-II rucksack system in almost every respect. Likewise, the strengths and weaknesses of the CFP-90 were taken into consideration when designing the MOLLE-II backpack system. This explain why I feel the MOLLE-II system is the best backpack the military has ever issued. Yes, there may be some bugs in the system. Yes, the frame needs to be improved so it’s more durable. With this being said, the improved shoulder straps, kidney belt, sleeping bag carrying system and the introduction of the assault pack are all outstanding improvements. I’m sure the average soldier who has used all 3 systems mentioned in this article would confess the MOLLE-II is the best system up to date if pressed. I also think they would quickly admit that they love their assault packs.

In summary, I would recommend the MOLLE-II backpack system to any soldier and a wide variety of civilian backpack users. This system is comfortable, practical and despite having some shortcomings with the frame it is durable. It could be put to use in many civilian applications, and it is very inexpensive when compared to other big name brands. I would suggest the MOLLE backpack offers civilians more value or bang for the buck when compared with many civilian options. I would encourage backpackers to do their homework, compare prices and take a closer look at this piece of equipment. I believe you will discover that the MOLLE-II backpack has much to offer the rugged outdoorsman and professional soldier.

Sincerely;

William G. McKinney
Bradley’s Military Enterprises
President

MOLLE (pronounced MOLLY as in the female name) is an acronym for MOdular Lightweight Load-carrying Equipment. It is used to define the current generation of load-bearing equipment and rucksacks utilized by the United States armed forces, especially the United States Army, and its use is also growing in the British Army in the form of the Osprey Modular systems. The system’s modularity is derived from the use of PALS webbing, rows of heavy-duty nylon stitched onto the vest as to allow for attachment of various MOLLE-compatible pouches and accessories. This method of attachment has become a de facto standard for modular tactical gear, replacing the older ALICE equipment.  It is produced for the United States Government under contract by several contractors, such as Specialty Defense, Armor Holdings, and Ehmke Manufacturing/High Ground Gear.  This introduction was found on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOLLE_(military).  You can find other valuable information about the MOLLE system on this site.

The MOLLE system can be broken down into 4 categories that consist of the following items:

In this first article on MOLLE gear I will discuss the FLC or Field Loading Carrier.  In layman’s terms this is a tactical vest.  This tactical vest has removal pouches, and it can be assembled to suit a soldier’s needs.  Allow me to describe the evolution of web gear, load bearing vests and today’s MOLLE system.

In 1982 I was issued a web gear. Soldier commonly referred to their web gear as LBE or Load Bearing Equipment.  They also used the terminology LCE or Load Carrying Equipment. The system consisted of the following items:

The genuine issued pistol belt has a series of large circular garment holes running along the belt.  Using straps with fixed metal clips, the Y-harness could attach to the holes in the pistol belt creating a carrying system.  Two 1-quart canteens would be placed inside of the canteen cups, and then the 2 combined items would fit snuggly into the canteen pouch.  Using a combination of metal clips or “ALICE Keepers” the 1-quart canteen systems would be attached to the left and right sides of the pistol belt. In a similar fashion, 2 ammo pouches would attach to the pistol belt in the abdomen area.  Finally, the utility pouch would clip onto a metal link attached to a shoulder strap on the Y-harness system.  When all of these items were assembled as described it would create a standard web gear configuration.  Each ammo pouch would hold up to three 30-round magazines, and the utility pouch would house a compression bandage or compass.  The ammo pouch also had built in straps on each side of the pouch that had the ability to carry 2 fragmentation grenades.

Soldiers had the option to attach a fanny pack to the back side of the pistol belt and Y-harness using metal ALICE keepers.  The angle head flashlight had a built in metal clip that could be attached to a metal link on the Y-harness.  A small ear protection case was commonly attached to a Y-harness shoulder strap.  Finally, using a strap the 2-quart canteen system could be worn around the waist, carried over the shoulder or attached with metal ALICE keepers to the pistol belt.

The web gear I have described was the equipment carrying system of choice from World War II until the early 1990′s.  In the early years, the various components were made of heavy cotton.  The harness system was called an “H-harness” in these days because it was shaped like the letter H.  All of the components were attached with metal links and clips, and few changes were made over the years.  Eventually cotton was replaced with nylon, and the pistol belt adopted a plastic quick release buckle.  This quick release buckle was eventually replaced with the plastic Fastex buckle.  The changes in buckle systems  allowed the equipment to be put on or removed more quickly.  Despite these changes for convenience, the military’s web gear system basically remained the same for many decades

In the mid 1990′s the military institution revolutionized how fighting equipment was carried when it introduced the Load bearing Vest or LBV.  Instead of using a series of straps a vest system was created.  This vest was made of lightweight nylon fabric with foam padding in the shoulders. The nylon material had a Woodland Camouflage pattern.  Two plastic quick release buckles were used to open or close the front of the vest.  The vest was intended to be attached to a pistol belt using a series of nylon straps.  To ensure these straps remained closed both Velcro and a metal garment snap was incorporated.  Similar to the older load bearing equipment canteen systems, ammo pouches and a fanny pack were regularly attached to the pistol belt.

The vest consists of suspenders, a left, right and back panel that are connected with adjustable draw cords in a corset lacing system secured by cord locks. The vest weighs 1.8 pounds empty.  It provides space for six 30 round magazines in four permanently attached ammunition pockets (two each in the outside pockets, and one each in the inside pockets) and two fragmentation grenades in two grenade pockets.  Using a draw cord system, the vest offered a one size fits all approach.

In the mid-1990s, the ITLBV was redesigned due to problems with ventilation and redesignated as the Enhanced Tactical Load Bearing Vest (ETLBV) with slanted ammunition pockets and mesh panels.  Despite these shortcomings, the LBV system was significantly more comfortable than the older web gear system. This newer system could carry more equipment, it carried equipment more quietly and its broad shoulder padding system supported the weight load better.  Perhaps the standard web gear system was cooler, but this is one of few advantages the older system possessed.

Around the same timeframe that the LBV was introduced the M-203 vest was also issued to soldiers.  This vest was similar to the LBV in many respects except it had 20 pockets to carry the M-79 and M-203 grenade launchers’ 40mm ammunition.  Similar to the LBV, the pockets on the M-203 system was sewn directly into the vest.  This inability to remove pouches or customize the 2 systems would lead to the introduction of the MOLLE Fighting Loading Carrier or FLC.

* Note: A substantial amount of the information was found at ciehub.info/equipment/loadbearing/IIFS/ITLBV.html.  I encourage you to read this article.

In the early 2000 era the Load Bearing Vest spun off the Fighting Load Carrier or FLC.  Made of Cordura material and nylon mesh this vest was first offered in woodland  and 3-color desert camouflage.  Today it is also offered in Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP) and in Multi-Cam camouflage officially known as Operation Enduring Freedom Camouflage Pattern or OCP .  The major upgrade that seperates the newer FLC from the older LBV is the removable pouches.  The FLC integrates a modular approach using a PALS grids system.  The PALS grid consists of horizontal rows of 1″ webbing, spaced 1″ apart, and reattached to the backing at 1.5″ intervals.  These series of sewn in straps leaves small loops that can weave in various MOLLE pouches.  MOLLE compatible pouches have long straps on the back of the items.  A snap is also built into the straps.  Therefore, the pouch straps can be woven into the PALS grids that are on the face of the FLC vest.  Once the pouch is firmly woven into place the metal snap is snapped closed securing the pouch to the vest.  This improved attachment system allows soldiers to use a wide selection of pouches, and they can configure their vest in a manner their best suits their needs.

There are 3 general modes of attachment in the MOLLE arena, they are “Natick Snap”, that uses a polyethylene reinforced webbing strap with the ‘push-the-dot’ snap for security. There is the polymer “Malice” clip developed by Tactical Tailor as an alternative to the Natick Snap concept, which interweaves like the Natick Snap but terminates in a semi-permanent closure that requires a screwdriver/flat tipped object to disengage. Finally there are a variety of attachments that fall into the “Weave & Tuck” category in which the end of an interwoven strap is tucked into an item’s backing after attachment to a vest or pack (Paraclete’s SofStrap and Spec Ops Brand’s hybrid attachment).

MOLLE POUCHES:

There are many MOLLE compatible pouches that can be used with the FLC system, and this list of products continues to grow longer over time.  Some of the pouches and attachments that are available are as follows:

Standard Ammo pouches    -    Grenade Pouches    -    Canteen Pouches / Utility Pouches

9mm Pouches    -    IFAK Medical Kits    -     40mm Grenade Pouches

3-Mag Pouches    -    ALICE/K-BAR Adapters      -     Sheaths/Holsters

…and much more!

Any piece of equipment that is MOLLE compatible can be attached to the FLC system, and even older military equipment can be used with an ALICE adaptor.  This new technology is becoming so popular that it is even being used in the civilian sector.  As a result of this growing popularity many new civilian products are springing forth that can be used with the official MOLLE systems.  Without a doubt, the highly versatile nature of the MOLLE FLC makes it unquestionably the best tactical vest the military has ever issued.

MY OPINION:

PROS:

• The attachment process used in the MOLLE system is grossly superior to the ALICE system.  The older metal ALICE keepers were prone to spring open, and it was common to lose your field equipment.  This problem was so bad that soldiers would commonly use 550 cord or “dummy cord” to tie down their equipment.  The introduction of the MOLLE attachment system substantially reduces the need for dummy cord.
• The older cotton web gear items were highly durable, but it became heavy when wet.  Furthermore, these older cotton items were prone to mildew and odor.
• The metal link systems used with older web gear was difficult to put on or take off.  The introduction of plastic quick release buckles and Fastex buckles allows faster & easier  access.
• You can load far more equipment with the LBV and FLC systems than you ever could with standard web gear.
• The shoulder strap systems with the LBV & FLC systems are far superior to the older Y or H harnesses.  It supports weight better, and it reduces pressure on your neck and shoulders.
• There is far less chaffing associated with the new vest systems.
• The LBV and FLC is substantially quieter than the older web gear.  Even after tying and taping down older forms of web gear it rattled about making a lot of noise.
• The modular system associated with the MOLLE FLC makes it superior to the older LBV.  The FLC is more versatile, it has more accessories and it can hold more equipment.  The fact that it can be configured in many ways makes it more suitable for the different branches of the military.
• The newest versions of the FLC is well constructed, and it is more durable than the older LBV.

CONS:

• “Old School” web gear was substantially less expensive to purchase than today’s MOLLE gear.  MOLLE equipment is expensive, and it is hurts your wallet to replace.
• You can assemble or disassemble web gear quicker than a FLC.  MOLLE gear is a bit complex, but it holds in place better preventing equipment loss.
• Web gear is also lighter and cooler, but I’m confident the vast majority of soldiers would agree the newer tactical vest systems are far superior than what we had “back in the day.”

SUMMARY:

I’m impressed with the evolution of the military’s clothing & equipment.  For the most part, each generation demonstrates significant improvement. This trend holds true with various equipment carrying systems. Closing out the web gear era and introducing tactical vests was a very wise decision.  Introducing interchangeable modular equipment and improving the attachment systems was another step forwards.  As a result of this new technology soldiers can carry more fighting equipment comfortably.  There is less rattling and noise.  There is less chaffing and abrasion, and today’s new materials can reduce past problems associated with overheating.  The improvements I have witnessed in tactical gear over the past decade is truly amazing, and this trend doesn’t appear to be coming to an end.  As I am writing this article the Army is in the process of introducing the Tactical Assault Panel or TAP.  The Tactical Assault Panel is to replace the Fighting Load Carrier. It is a bib like chest rig that can mount to the Improved Outer Tactical Vest or Soldier Plate Carrier System, or on its own.^[4] The T.A.P. is covered with PALS webbing and storage for up to six rifle magazines.

Although I have seen and held the new TAP system, I don’t feel I possess enough knowledge to write about this new chest harness.  Allow me to speak with my customers and gather more feedback about this equipment.  When I have enough information I will discuss this product in another article.  For the time being I will repeat my message that the trend in military equipment is moving in a positive direction, and I anticipate I will have good things to say about this “Tactical Chest Panel” in the near future.  In my next article I will discuss the advantages and shortcomings associated with the MOLLE ruck system.  Until then, go outside, stay active and may you remain warm and dry!

*NOTE:  For more information about MOLE equipment check out the following articles at:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_Integrated_Fighting_System

MOLLE Care and Use Manual(PDF)

Sincerely;

William G. McKinney
Bradley’s Military Enterprises
President

With the exception of the level VII extreme cold weather parka & trousers, I have written articles on all of the Generation III ECWCS items.  In this article I will critique the final clothing items and close out this subject.  I look forwards to speaking about some of the other impressive advances the military has made in its new equipment systems.  The changes that has taken place over the past decade are truly amazing.

As the name suggests the extreme cold weather fishtail parka was introduced in 1951.  It consisted of 3 parts that included the parka shell, a removable liner and hood.  The original shell was made of 100% cotton material, and other blends followed.  The older removable hood had fox fur around the brim which later was replaced with synthetic fur.  The original liner was made of mohair, and later models were made of quilted nylon.

I will confess that I was never fond of the fishtail parka.  The outer shell was only useful for blocking the wind.  The main thrust of the fishtail parka’s warmth came from the liner and trapping air.  The mohair liner was warm, but it was uncomfortable, heavy when wet and took forever to dry.  The quilted nylon liner lacked the warmth of the older mohair model, but it was light, comfortable and dried quickly.  Although the M1956 Fishtail Parka is commonly called the “Extreme Cold Weather” or “Arctic” Parka I couldn’t image using it in subzero conditions, and I truly empathize for the Korean War era soldiers that used it in combat.  During this time frame if your objective was keeping warm in extreme cold weather conditions a N3-B or N2-B parka would have been much better.  Bottom line, I wouldn’t rate the fishtail parka highly in any extreme cold weather settings.

Despite the shortcomings associated with the fishtail parka various versions of it has been issued to soldiers for 5 decades.  I was issued one in 1982, and Bradley’s regularly sold these parkas until the early 2000 era.  Without a doubt, the Gore-Tex Parka and the Generation III Extreme Cold Weather Parka is grossly superior in almost every respect.

The GEN III Extreme Cold Weather Parka and Trousers are designed for use during static operations in extreme cold, dry conditions. Constructed with an outer shell fabric that has a water resistant finish and with PrimaLoft® Sport thermal bonded high-loft insulation, Level VII is highly durable and breathable. The Parka and Trousers maintain warmth even when wet and provide protection in extreme cold conditions during static operations.

• Two-way center-front zipper with protective wind flap
• Nylon reinforced elbows
• Two front zipper pockets
• Ripstop nylon inner lining
• Bottom hem with elastic cord for adjustability
• High collar with collapsible, stowable insulated hood
• Velcro fasteners for rank and name plates
• Color: Urban Gray

• Zippered fly opening
• Nylon reinforced knees
• Full-length side zipper openings
• Elastic waist with provisions for suspenders
• Color: Urban Gray

My Opinion:

The Generation III extreme cold weather parka and trousers live up to its name.  It is much lighter and more airy than the N3-B parka; and as stated before, it is substantially warmer than the fishtail parka.  This may be confusing, but soldiers commonly call this product the “loft Jacket,” not to be confused with the level III high loft fleece jacket. Soldiers also call it the “Michelin Man Suit” because you will look like the Michelin Tire mascot when you are wearing it.  It makes sense that soldiers call this extreme cold weather gear “loft” jackets & pants because it resembles something you would see at a ski loft.  Although it looks like typical ski clothing it is surprisingly light and comfortable.  Most importantly, it stands up to bitterly cold weather.

I will confess that I’m not into military fashion wear, but I like the appearance of the new ECW parka.  It is has a very stylish look to it, and I sense that skiers, snowmobilers, and ice fishermen would love this product.  It looks like the type of high end clothing you would find at Orvis, Cabellas or Gander Mountain.  The reason for this stems from the fact that it is made from cutting edge technology and the best materials available, but this surplus clothing has an unbeatable price tag.

If you are an unlucky soldier who hasn’t been issued the generation III extreme cold weather parka & trousers or any of the ECWCS components I highly recommend this product line to you.  Once again, I also recommend this extreme cold weather clothing to serious outdoorsmen and survivalists.  If you fit these demographics I’m confident you could use these items.  Most likely you will like the light, breathable and water resistant qualities associated with the system, but you will love the price tag Bradley’s can offer you.  Do your homework, and you will find Bradley’s has a nice selection of extreme cold weather gear at very reasonable prices.  Enjoy your outdoor activities and stay warm!

Sincerely;

William G. McKinney
Bradley’s Military Enterprises
President

I have discussed the attributes associated with silk weight undergarments, grid fleece thermal underwear, polar fleece clothing, wind shirts and various Gore-Tex products. After I critique the Army’s newest extreme cold weather parka & trousers and the soft shell system, you will have a good understanding about the 7 levels that are associated with the Extended Climate Warfighter Clothing System or ECWCS. In this article I will focus my attention on the soft shell jacket & trousers, and save the ECWCS clothing items for my next article.

In my last article I mentioned that the wind shirt was very unique, and no previous military clothing item really compares against it. Likewise, the soft shell system is also unique, and it doesn’t have a close relative. It is too thin and airy to be closely compared against the field jacket or trousers. It is also too sophisticated and versatile to be compared against the military’s simple over white jacket & trousers. It has its own special niche, but if I had to compare it against any product I would say it has similarities with some types of civilian brush clothing. The soft shell system would be ideal for cutting a path through tall grass and brush.

• Two-way center-front zipper with protective wind flap
• High collar with stowable collapsible hood
• Velcro closure sleeve and front pockets
• Ventilation openings under the sleeves
• Velcro fasteners for rank and name plates
• General Features:
• Constructed with stretchable, breathable water resistant materials
• Light-Weight, low bulk and extreme comfort
• Thongs on zippers for ease of use when wearing gloves
• Color: OCP / MultiCam, Universal Camouflage

• Trouser Features:
• Zippered fly opening
• Velcro closure front and side cargo pockets
• Calf-high side-zippers with elastic cuff
• Elastic waist with provisions for suspenders
• General Features:
• Constructed with stretchable, breathable water resistant materials
• Light-Weight, low bulk and extreme comfort
• Thongs on zippers for ease of use when wearing gloves
• Color: OCP / MULTICAM, Universal Camouflage

The Typical Customers Who Purchases Soft Shell Garments:

When the ECWCS system was first introduced the wind shirt was popular with military and civilian customers. The silk weight, grid fleece, polar fleece and Gore-Tex products continue to rank amongst my better selling winter items for any audience. In contrast, the soft shell jacket and trouser has largely sold to the military community. Soldiers are issued these items at no cost, but they have to return this clothing when they clear a post or end their military service. If soft shell products are damaged or lost soldiers are required to purchase these items or take a statement of charges.

The only other customer who tends to purchase soft shell clothing are military enthusiasts such as air soft or paintball players. Although we don’t receive much demand in this area, I would recommend soft shell jackets & trousers in Multi Cam camouflage to hunters. Multi Cam is a highly effective camouflage in most settings. The soft shell clothing is light, breathable, water resistant and designed for layering. Once again, it lends itself well for cutting paths through tall grass or brush. I can sense that hunters would like this product.

Wouldn’t It Be Nice?

I believe the manufactures who produce soft shell jackets & trousers should consider offering their product in solid while. Perhaps a reversible model would be optimal. The soft shell product line is grossly superior to the military’s over white parka & trousers in every respect. Therefore, if the soft shell jacket & trousers were offered in white, it would phase out the Army’s current snow camouflage system. In most cases, it would allow soldiers to blend into their extreme cold weather surroundings better. It would also be ideal for goose, coyote and other winter game hunters.

Summary:

All of the ECWCS clothing items are made with state of the art materials. Its layering system is designed to be light, increase breathability, keep you warm and prevent overheating. It is made of highly durable materials that can stand up to the most rugged terrain or activities. If you are an elite soldier, serious hunter or a hardcore survivalist, I recommend the soft shell system and all of the ECWCS product line. In my opinion, this is the most technologically advanced clothing system the Army has ever issued.

Sincerely;

William G. McKinney
Bradley’s Military Enterprises
President

New Technology:

The army issued wind jacket is a very unique clothing item that doesn’t compare to any other product the military has used in the past. You can compare the Generation III silk weight items against the “old school” sleeping shirt. You can compare the level II grid fleece shirts & trousers against the previous military issued thermal underwear. You can also compare the level VI Gore-Tex system against various wet weather garments, but what can you compare a wind shirt against? As far as I’m aware there is no comparison. The wind Jacket is the first of its kind.

The wind jacket is loose, airy and very comfortable. Personally, I wouldn’t describe it as a wind breaker because it looks more like a shirt. This explains why it is commonly called the “wind shirt” by soldiers. When I think of the Extended Climate Warfighter Clothing System or ECWCS, I tend to think of extreme cold weather clothing items, but the wind jacket is an odd fit in this package. When I visualize myself using this product I can see me wearing it on a blistering hot day at Ft. Hood Texas or Ft. Sill Oklahoma. It would be ideal in a hot dry setting where the winds were flowing across the plains. Other than an additional layer of clothing, I don’t know how this product fits into a cold weather clothing system. Since I’m somewhat confused by this product I will provide the following information that I found on an official web site:

“The GEN III Wind Jacket is designed to act as a low volume shell layer that optimizes the moisture wicking properties of other GEN III insulating and next-to-skin levels. It is also designed to be worn under body armor.”

Features:

• Constructed with MILLIKEN® nylon spandex material with a water resistant finish
• Optimizes moisture wicking properties of other GEN III layers
• Designed for wear under body armor and with the ACU
• Increased wind and sand protection
• Extreme low weight and bulk
• Angled chest pockets with mesh lining for ventilation
• Velcro closure sleeve pockets
• Elasticized cuffs
• Velcro fasteners for rank and name plates
• Color: Universal Camouflage

Why you should have one:

Since my days as a soldier are long behind me, I tend to look at the wind jacket for use in many civilian applications.  I often wear it camping during the summer or when I’m chopping wood at my friend’s hunting camp in early fall.  Its loose airy feel is ideal when I’m overly active.  It helps me stay cool and dry, and I simply love the way it feels.  Comprised of 100% nylon and made by prestigious companies such as Patagonia, it is obvious this product is well constructed and built to last.  Once again, I use this product as a shirt rather than a jacket.

When the wind jacket was first introduced it was one of my better selling items.  This is especially true for Bradley’s mail order operations.  Over the years it has produced excellent customer feedback, and I have recommended it to many customers including soldiers and survivalists.  Today demand for the wind shirt has declined, and I don’t know why.  It is a good product with reasonable price.  For the most part, Bradley’s sells wind jackets to soldiers that lost the item and need to clear the Central Issuing Facility or CIF.  I don’t sell many wind shirts to civilians these days.  Perhaps it has lost its new exciting image, but I wouldn’t read into this statement.  The wind jacket is an outstanding piece of military clothing, and there are many practical applications for it in civilian settings.

Overall, I would rate the wind jacket highly.  I wish I was able to use it during my years in the Army, and I would recommend it to any soldier.  Its loose light fit is very comfortable, and it is money well spent.  If you are an elite soldier or rugged survivalist I encourage you to try this product.  I’m confident you will like it.

For more information about the wind shirt or any other ECWCS Generation III items visit:

www.adsinc.com/solutions/clothing-​programs/gen-iii-ecwcs

Sincerely;

William G. McKinney
Bradley’s Military Enterprises
President

In my first 4 articles I have praised the military’s polypropylene, grid fleece, silk weight and polar fleece products.  Since 3 of the 4 articles I have written about are parts of the Extended Climate Warfighter Clothing System I will continue to evaluate the other ECWCS garments.  In this article I will discuss the Army’s most innovative wet weather product known as Gore-Tex, and how it is superior to vinyl, PVC, rubberized nylon and nylon rip stop.

When I joined the Army in 1982 I was issued OD green wet weather jackets, trousers, and ponchos.  These products were made of vinyl or rubberized nylon.  I was also issued black rubber goulashes.  These products were very effective at repelling water, but they also cause soldiers to overheat when active.  The problem with overheating was so serious that most soldiers wouldn’t wear these wet weather products while road marching or when it was hot.  Basically we used our wet weather gear while we were in garrison, pulling guard duty or holding down a parameter.  Once we got busy we took off our wet weather gear and allowed ourselves to get wet.  It was better to be wet that to overheat.

Two years later I was issued a nylon rip stop poncho that was made from woodland camouflage material.  It was lighter and more breathable that the older vinyl poncho, but the rip stop poncho didn’t repel rain very well.  Shortly after a heavy down pour the rain would penetrate my poncho, and I was soaked.  To be honest, I preferred the older vinyl or rubberized poncho.  Soldiers nick named this wet weather item the “bullet proof poncho” because it would keep you dry in a typhoon.  I can remember buying  an older poncho for field use because it was better at repelling water than the nylon rip stop poncho.

I was also issue a pair of OD green rubberized boots when I was issued my rip stop poncho.  I liked this product, because it was significantly easier to get on and off when compared to the older goulashes.  The goulashes had an awkward metal buckling system that could be frustrating to open and close.  The rubber band fastening system that is built into the over boots was much easier.  The over boot was lighter and had a better fit.  Bottom line, the wet weather gear we used in the 80′s had many draw backs that included water repellency, overheating and poor comfort.

When I rejoined the Army in 1990 I was introduced to the generation I Gore-Tex parka.  I immediately fell in love with this garment.  It was like a field jacket and wet weather parka all rolled into one product.  It kept me warm in the cold, and it repelled rain very well.  This product has pores that would allow heat vapor to escape while preventing water molecules from penetrating the Gore-Tex membrane.  It also had zippers under the arms that could be opened to reduce overheating.  In my opinion it is too warm to be used in weather conditions that exceed 50 to 60 degrees, so it has its draw backs.  Under these conditions basic wet weather gear or ponchos are better, but Gore-Tex is outstanding in cold damp settings.  Shortly after the Gore-Tex parka & trousers were introduced many other Gore-Tex products emerged.  These products include:

As you can see Gore-Tex is a versatile cold & wet weather product that is widely used in many military garments.  The reason it has became so popular is due to the material’s breathable nature.  A typical piece of Gore-Tex  has 9 billion pores.  These pores are 20,000 smaller than a drop of water.  It is also 700 times larger than heat vapor.  Therefore, water is repelled while heat vapor escapes.  Gore-Tex is enhanced when it is combined with Thinsulate.  Thinsulate is the thinnest and warmest form of insulation today.  The material is a synthetic fabric similar to Gore-Tex that is comprised of 65% Olelin and 35% Polyester.  It has 1.5 times more warmth than down with a fraction of the thickness.  This Gore-Tex and Thinsulate combination is commonly found in many military gloves and boots.

Features:

• MIL-P-44188: 100% Nylon (Microporus polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), Gore-Tex)
• Wind and waterproof
• Integral hood
• Two breast inside map pockets (which can be opened without unzipping the parka)
• Two large lower cargo pockets
• Two-way, full-front zipper to provide full face protection
• Elastic draw cord at the hem
• Velcro closures at the wrist tabs
• Underarm ventilation
• Rank tab at center chest

The Army Issued Gore-Tex parka had 3 phases of evolution up to date.  The first generation was more of a “true” parka with a fixed hood.  It had a thicker more durable construction than today’s generation III model.  When the Generation I parka & trousers was first introduced it was a revolutionary product that took the Army by storm.  As mentioned above, these Gore-Tex products gave birth to many other ideas and concepts.

Features:

• Sewn to Military Specifications MIL-DLT-32184
• New 3-Layer Waterproof, Windproof, and breathable GORE-TEX® Laminate
• New GORE-TEX® Fabric, Softer and Quieter than First Generation Design
• Durable Taped Seams with Gore-Seam® Tape>
• Moisture Wicking Barriers at Cuffs and Hemmed Bottom
• Heavy-Duty 330-Denier Cordura® Nylon Elbow Reinforcements
• Cargo Pockets with Hand Warmers
• Roll-n-Stow Hood
• Near Infrared (NIR) Compliant
• Made in Dominican Republic
• Non Berry Compliant
• NOTE TO MILITARY PERSONNEL: THIS GARMENT HAS NIR TECHNOLOGY AND IS APPROVED FOR MILITARY OPERATIONS

The major difference between the Generation I & II parkas was the hood system.  Instead of being a fixed hood, the generation II model had the ability to tuck in the hood into the collar similar as a field jacket.  This second generation was also quite thick and durable.  It had all of the wind proof, water proof and breathable qualities of the first generation.  Once again, the construction of the hood system was the major change of the Generation II parka.

Features:

• Constructed with 2-layer GORE-TEX® fabric based on GORE-TEX® Paclite® technology
• Completely waterproof, windproof and breathable
• Light-Weight: 50% less bulk than previous systems
• Near Infrared Textile Technology (NIR)
• Color: Universal Camouflage
• Center-front zipper with protective flap
• Pass through pockets
• Hideaway collar with a storable visor hood
• Elastic cuffed sleeves with Velcro adjusters

The Generation III Gore-Tex parka has a similar design as the generation II model in the respect that it has a hideaway hood that can be tucked into the collar.  The major difference with this parka is its light weight material.  It is significantly thinner and lighter than previous models.  Many soldiers are confused by the changes in this parka, and think it’s a wet weather jacket.  In some cases, I have to point out the Gore-Tex trade mark on the zipper’s pull tab to prove my point.  Although the parka is light it is durable.  Obviously not as durable as the generation I & II models, but it holds up very well to the challenges of military service.  In my opinion it also is inferior to the earlier models in terms of wind & cold blocking ability, but it has pluses.  First, it is made of Gore-Tex, and it has all of the breathable water repellent properties.  Second, it’s much lighter than its predecessors, and it is better suited for layering.  When combined with the other ECWCS clothing items such as silk weights, grid fleece and polar fleece it provides more warmth and comfort.  Third, its use of layering does a better job at preventing soldiers from overheating.  Finally, the generation III parka lends itself better in warmer weather due to its light thin construction.  For these reason I feel the generation III Gore-Tex parka & trousers are superior to the earlier generations.  It has all of the water repellent ability of older models, and you can add or subtract under garments and liners as needed for warmth or coolness.

Additional Notes:

Many of my customers think Gore-Tex is 100% waterproof at all times or under any conditions.  This is true for the most part, but with age, wear & tear Gore-Tex can leak.  This problem is easily correctable.  The Gore company has polishes and silicone sprays that can restore waterproofing.  These products are made, authorized or promoted for use by Gore.  Furthermore, on many occasions I have witnessed customers use products such as Scotch Guard on parkas and trousers.  Soldiers also use Sno-Seal’s bees wax on Gore-Tex boots.  I don’t know if this is good for the product or not, but soldiers profess it works very effectively.  Contact the Gore company for information if you experience any leaking associated with their products.

In summary, Gore-Tex is perhaps the best product every used in military clothing.  It is highly popular or even loved by soldiers.  As soldiers leave the Army they often sell their used products at Bradley’s.  As they sell their excess gear it is not uncommon for customers to say “Wait a second, I’ll keep my Gore-Tex jacket.  I can use this when I go hunting.”  The fact that soldiers hold on to their Gore-Tex products speaks volumes in itself.

For further information about Gore-Tex there’s a nice article on eHow(click here) regarding this amazing fabric, and another on Thinsulate as well. Both of these products are commonly used together, especially with gloves & boots.

Sincerely;

William G. McKinney
Bradley’s Military Enterprise
President

When I think of the Army’s most beloved products the P-38 can opener, the quilted nylon poncho liner, polypropylene underwear and Gore-Tex wet & cold weather products rates highly. Now this list needs to be expanded to include polar fleece products. Polar fleece is soft, warm and quiet. It softly conforms to the body without chaffing. When it is used in conjunction with polypropylene or grid fleece the combination is unbeatable in extreme cold weather settings.

Features:

• 100% synthetic poly fiber interior will keep you warm
• Zipper front closure
• Two expandable breast pockets with Velcro snap flaps
• Two front insulated hand warming pockets
• Black nylon re-enforced shoulders and underarms
• Nylon panels under the arms to allow breathability
The generation I Gore-Tex parka & bear jacket combination was a step in the right direction. It was superior to the field jacket & quilted nylon liner in many respects, but the bear jacket had its shortcomings. This fleece jacket had a very snug fit. It ran 1 size smaller than what was stated on the label, and it was tight around the shoulders. Furthermore, the poly fiber material was less supple or less conforming to the body as the polar fleece generations to come. This tight clinging fit reduced comfort and restricted movement, but it was very warm. This warmth explains why it was also known as the “smoking jacket.” It was so warm it could make you smoking hot when active.

* Note: Bradley’s has a clearance sales on used bear jackets for only $9.95. We only have small and medium sizes, but if you have a slender build it’s an excellent deal.

Features:

• Polartec® Classic 200
• Polartec® Classic 300
• Light & warm
• Highly breathable
• Dries quickly
• Durable
• Machine washable
• 2nd Generation Extended Cold Weather Clothing System (2G ECWCS) includes two different layers made with Polartec® fabrics: Polartec® Classic 300 shirt and Polartec® Classic 200 overalls. When used in combination with other layers in the ECWCS system, the system will provide protection between 40°F and -40°F (4°C and -40°C).

The generation II polar fleece jacket; also known as the “Spear Jacket,” was another step in the right direction. The first generation jacket was thicker and warmer than the generation II model, but the spear jacket was softer, more comfortable, and was less prone to overheating. The latter generation had a looser fit, and it was less restrictive in nature. The arm pit zippers could be opened to reduce overheating. The polar fleece material used with the generation II jacket and trousers was significantly more supple and it conformed to make a better fit. In my opinion, the generation II model was grossly superior to the first generation.

Features:

• Constructed with Polartec® Thermal Pro® material
• Traps air and retains body heat
• Increased warmth with significantly less weight than previous generation ECWCS
• Lower bulk with increased durability
• High collar with full zipper-front and wind protection flap
• Two internal chest pockets and two outer side pockets
• Nylon reinforced collar and elbows
• Polartec® Power Dry® Grid side panels for increased stretch and comfort
• Velcro fasteners for rank and name plates
• Color: Tan, Foliage Green
• Can be used as a jacket or jacket liner.
• Full front zipper.
• Armpit zippers that increases ventilation and prevents overheating.
• Drawstring waistband and hook & loop sleeve adjustments.
• Front slash zipper pockets.
• 2 inside mesh pockets.

The evolution of the Army issued polar fleece jacket has had a consistent trend. The material used to make each generation has become less thick and has provided less warmth. It should be noted that each generation had a looser fit, it conformed to the body better and it was more comfortable. I should also point out that each generation reduced the likeliness for overheating due to more breathable material and arm pit zippers. For most cold weather climates, the generation III model would provide enough warmth, and many would consider it to be the better jacket. Since I live in an extreme cold weather environment where the temperature commonly dips down to -20 F during the winter, I would prefer the generation II spear jacket model over the generation III high loft fleece jacket. I will confess that the high loft fleece jacket is the most comfortable and most breathable polar fleece jacket ever issued to US Army soldiers, but I would prefer the additional warmth of the generation II model. In the story of Goldie Locks the first bowl of porridge was “too hot” and another bowl was “too cool.” Likewise, the generation II spear Jacket was “just right.” It had the right combination of warmth, breathability, comfort and wind blocking ability. I feel the generation III jacket needs to be a little bit thicker, warmer and have more wind blocking ability. This is especially true for use in Afghanistan or at Ft. Drum New York.

Final notes, the generation I and II models had polar fleece trousers with built in suspenders. The generation III model doesn’t include polar fleece trousers, but the larger ECWCS system does offer new products known as grid fleece & soft shell trousers. I also want to point out that the Army uses a polar fleece watch cap during physical training. The new polar fleece model is softer, lighter, and more breathable than the older wool watch cap. All of the Army’s polypropylene, grid fleece and polar fleece clothing items are grossly superior to the older wool products.

MY OPINION:

The Army issued polar fleece jackets, trousers, and watch caps are all outstanding products. When polar fleece is used with silk weights, polypropylene, or grid fleece it only makes a good thing better. Polar fleece goes together with polypropylene or grid fleece like peanut butter and jelly. It’s a match made in heaven. Toss in a Gore-Tex cold weather parka with this fleece combination and you can survive prolonged exposure to bitterly cold weather. If you need more warmth the ECWCS system offers a generation III level 7 extreme cold weather jacket & trousers more commonly known as the “loft jacket & trousers.” These layers trap air creating warmth, and these layers can be added or subtracted to stay warm while avoiding overheating.

I know my customers that are largely comprised of 10th Mountain Division soldiers love their polar fleece products. I’m also aware that civilians such as hunters and survivalists also enjoy polar fleece because it’s quiet and doesn’t make noise when it comes in contact with various surfaces. If you are an active person that enjoys extreme cold weather outdoor activities you will cherish the military’s polar fleece clothing items. This is especially true when combined with silk weight, polypropylene and grid fleece under garments and a Gore-Tex parka on top. The polar fleece jacket serves as an excellent liner. When I go steelhead fishing in the heart of winter I always use this combination so I can enjoy myself when temperatures drop into the teens or even lower.

* Note: For more information about military polar fleece jackets & trousers manufacturer information is available here: ADS Inc. Generation III ECWCS

Sincerely;

William G. McKinney
Bradley’s Military Enterprises
President